Did Barack Obama test wealth redistribution on his daughters before applying th concept to the rest of us?

What does Barack Obama do, if
Malia studies all day long and and brings home A+, and
Natasha watches cartoons all day long and brings home C-.

Does he give equal box of candies to both of his daughters?

He holds a conference call with both teachers and asks if they could both have a B.

Malia complains "But dad, I worked hard for my A+! I studdied every night while my sister just played with her dolls. It's not fair!"
Obama reassures her "Darling, from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

vote for Obama Produce and Obey
vote for McCain Free America All the Way!

Post a Comment or Leave a Trackback

33 Comments

  1. Louis S
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 8:11 am | Permalink

    No…….Obama will test his wealth redistribution socialist agenda on the American people. We are the experimental rats.
    References :

  2. 5 days to go
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 8:44 am | Permalink

    Get ready for a 12 year absence from the Whitehouse.
    References :

  3. 20090120!
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 9:26 am | Permalink

    very “smart question”

    No.
    References :

  4. Hari Seldon
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 10:02 am | Permalink

    do you plan to love your children different amounts?
    References :

  5. eir
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    lol
    References :

  6. Ken S
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 11:30 am | Permalink

    As funny as that sounds. I see your point.
    References :

  7. Patrick
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    You miss the point of Socialist and Communist leaders. They take everyone else’s money and redistribute it how they see fit. They never give up any of their own money, just yours.
    References :

  8. Kevin B
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    I heard he gives them like 1 dollar per week allowance.
    References :

  9. Rajko
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 12:30 pm | Permalink

    I don't understand why he didn't redistribute his record setting donations to McCain, who didn't raise as much money?

    And to answer your question, no, he would take the A+ away and make sure they both had Bs.
    References :

  10. dianne1Three
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    i know thjats a shame
    References :

  11. Morey000
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Poor analogy.
    A better analogy might be to look at what his progressive tax is, and notice that it doesn’t even roll back taxation to what it was under Regan or Clinton.
    References :

  12. beardog4314
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    Why do you assume he bribes them with boxes of candies? An education is it’s own reward.
    References :

  13. Mike
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

    No. This is question makes no sense whatsoever.
    References :

  14. Forget War Buy More
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Well, if we’re going to bring up daughters, apparently Palin’s policy regarding sexual education didn’t work well when applying the concept.
    References :

  15. Earth: The Connected Home
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    He holds a conference call with both teachers and asks if they could both have a B.

    Malia complains "But dad, I worked hard for my A+! I studdied every night while my sister just played with her dolls. It's not fair!"
    Obama reassures her "Darling, from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

    vote for Obama Produce and Obey
    vote for McCain Free America All the Way!
    References :

  16. S.d0T
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    if he didn’t i doubt that would have any impact on their health care or the economy.
    References :

  17. Franklin Pierce best pres evah!
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    No, he asks Chellie why they didn’t abort both of them.
    References :

  18. Shadow Knight the Jedi
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    *chuckle*

    Actually to fit the concept your analogy would have to go like this:

    Malia sold 20 boxes of cookies and the money she earned was shared with Natasha who sold only 10 boxes of cookies.

    Of course she only had to share 3 percent of her earnings after the refund she got from her dad for her business expenses.
    References :

  19. No Pinheads
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 5:37 pm | Permalink

    Obama gives them a box of candies from YOUR tax dollars not HIS. that is the basic concept practiced for years by marxist socialists

    McCain will win in Nov and send the junior Karl Marx back to Chicago
    References :

  20. Baby Slayer!!!
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 5:43 pm | Permalink

    Does it really matter? We know he’s a socialist.
    References :

  21. Fancy That
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 5:51 pm | Permalink

    your premisis is flawed. Did you know that schools like Harvard and Yale give way more ‘credits’ to entry exam scores for legacies than affirmative action every did?

    So, what does it mean when Johnny White goes to a well funded school in the Burbs and Mary Black goes to a rat infested crime hole in the city.

    When we spend equal amounts of the education of each child, regardless of their parents real estate wealth then maybe your arguement will have some merit. but not now

    References :

  22. tankgirl190
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 6:16 pm | Permalink

    yes, that sounds about right. after all fair is fair. what, you don’t think he would be a hypocrite and not APPLY what he has been blabbing about do you? ;)
    References :

  23. Obama/Biden_08
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 6:44 pm | Permalink

    Since Palin (In Alaska) supports the closest thing to socialism in our country, your argument would better be applied to her.
    References :

  24. Sfancik
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    He would give all the candy to Natasha and know that whatever she didn’t want would trickle down to Malia.
    References :

  25. Return of Bite My Shiny Metal...
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    The first answer completely misses the point. How many of the 79.3% of high school dropouts in Detroit should expect to make $100K annually? Obama wants to give them what they were too lazy to earn.
    References :

  26. bob z
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 7:25 pm | Permalink

    No, I’m sure he would rather watch one eat and the other starve, before asking them to share.

    The consolation: People who come up with these questions surely aren’t of voting age.
    References :

  27. Leni C
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 7:41 pm | Permalink

    Are you getting paid to spout this drivel. No wonder McCain is out of money. Your question, and I use that term loosely,is almost impossible to answer, but I’ll give it a shot NO.
    References :

  28. tasha w
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 8:25 pm | Permalink

    No. According to his logic, Malia’s A+ would not mean as much, and she would not receive the full praise and rewards due her for independently earning that grade. The “excess” grade would be redistributed to Natasha to bring up the value and worth of her C-. The ‘wealth’ of the grade would be redistributed somewhat like this: Malia would be recognized for only a B
    Natasha would be recognized for only a B
    The other quarter of the grade would fund the process of redistribution and manifest as recognition for the parents who raised them.
    This is why the overachievers are resentful and why there is no incentive for the lazy to do better.
    References :

  29. Emmy
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 8:49 pm | Permalink

    your questions are always dismissive of thought
    References :

  30. rockominal2000
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 8:56 pm | Permalink

    That was funny! Yes, it looks like this guy can afford to play house in his new quasi-American home paid for by freakish sources. I can see it now. Oprah Winfrey having her shows and interviews over at the Barry Obaama household; swooning over his wife and daughters..
    References :

  31. brave new world
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    Is one of them a multi-billionaire wanting Corporate welfare and the other one working poor who can’t afford health insurance for her family?
    That would work then.
    References :

  32. V O
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    How do tax cuts represent candy again? Does the government, when cutting taxes, give you something, or does it let you keep something you already earned?
    References :

  33. lillith25
    Posted November 3, 2008 at 10:28 pm | Permalink

    You don’t understand how his redistribution of wealth works. It applies to everyone but him and the rest of the his “big government “elitist” aristocracy”
    References :

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.